Last updated: 2026-02-09
Scholar Sidekick is a lightweight citation-export tool for one-off academic and clinical needs. It is designed to complement existing reference managers, not replace them.
This page explains what the tool does, when it is useful, and when it is not.
What Scholar Sidekick is
Scholar Sidekick helps users quickly generate correct, predictable citation outputs from common scholarly identifiers such as DOIs, PMIDs, ISBNs, and URLs.
It is intentionally designed to be:
- Lightweight and web-based
- Usable without an account for one-off tasks
- Focused on deterministic citation output
- Suitable for short, self-contained tasks
The emphasis is on clarity, correctness, and minimal overhead.
What Scholar Sidekick is not
Scholar Sidekick is deliberately not a full reference manager.
It does not aim to:
- Manage long-term citation libraries
- Store or organise collections of references
- Replace tools such as Zotero, EndNote, Mendeley, or similar
- Support collaborative library management
For long manuscripts, theses, or ongoing research projects, a dedicated reference manager remains the appropriate tool.
When Scholar Sidekick is useful
Scholar Sidekick is well suited to situations such as:
- Preparing talks or lectures
- Creating conference posters or abstracts
- Drafting grant applications or committee documents
- Teaching materials or course handouts
- Journal clubs or guideline summaries
- Any task requiring a small number of citations quickly and correctly
These are often time-constrained, one-off workflows where setting up or maintaining a citation library is unnecessary overhead.
Why it exists
In practice, we repeatedly saw people struggle with:
- Needing a handful of references quickly
- Inconsistent citation output across tools
- The friction of creating or maintaining a library for short tasks
- Unclear or unpredictable CSL behaviour
Scholar Sidekick exists to address that narrow gap - and nothing more.
Design principles
The tool is built around a small set of constraints:
- Deterministic output: the same input should produce the same result
- Minimal state: no required accounts and no long-term storage by default
- Standards-aware: careful handling of citation styles and formats
- Transparency: predictable behaviour, no hidden automation
These constraints are intentional and shape what the tool does - and what it avoids doing.
Safety, privacy, and trust
- No account is required for the core, one-off usage of the tool
- Citation inputs are processed on demand and not stored after the request completes
- Only minimal operational logs are retained
- No advertising, tracking, or profiling
More detail is available on the Privacy and Accessibility pages.
When you should not use Scholar Sidekick
Scholar Sidekick is probably not the right tool if:
- You are writing a thesis or long manuscript
- You need ongoing citation library management
- You collaborate on shared reference databases
- You require advanced annotation or note-taking features
In those cases, a full reference manager will serve you better.
In short
Scholar Sidekick is a small, focused tool for a specific class of problems. It aims to be useful precisely by not trying to do everything.
